sometimes also there are differences -- you know, people who vote ahead of time and people who go to the polls may be different types of voters. for news you can rely on. "Check your facts" is short and sweet - but it's got a "merge" tag on it. -- Wikidemo 02:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC), Has anyone gone through the "see also" section and the "external links" section here? It is obvious that we shouldn't be repeating our sources' errors, and yet people are applying our current policies to essentially deny that those errors even exist. helping you buy better. Are we really prepared to re-phrase fact-checking above as "fact"-checking? the president's rhetoric about the coming election is the equivalent of trying to crash a car. it's more akin to frankly of the coronavirus, you know, just like in that case, we have to have social distancing, we have to stop the spread, we have to warn people that this can happen, and we have to do everything we can to find the vaccine. one a day natural fruit bites. we're probably going to see long lines, short staffed, poorly funded precincts. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC). For instance, the Piotrus' note above amazingly omits the scholarly argument as a whole. gum detoxify, from crest. there's going to be three more months of this. it would be unprecedented and unacceptable for the republican national committee, for the party and the convention planners to keep the press out during the convention. Does anyone use it? >> speaking of fox, errol, this thing about a week ago but i want to bring it because i think it's troubling that fox's jesse waters promoting on his weekend fox show and later claimed he doesn't believe it, but he was on the air saying they found a lot of stuff about the deep state and jeffrey epstein. (Keep It Simple Stupid). the book full of scoops about trump and fox an the distortion of truth. go ahead. harmful bacteria lurk just below the gum line. get 0% apr financing up to 36 months on select new and certified pre-owned models. The Wikipedia:Convenience links essay page was almost completely moribund until a slight flurry of activity in the past couple weeks. in portraying this alleged "legality" merely states its legality. I recently posted segments of an email conversation I had with Jimbo Wales which touched in IMDB to User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr., but I'm reposting it here as it's relevant. Four: it moves us away from K.I.S.S. cannot possibly be a reliable source in and of itself. Even if it were, what particular polls would we use? i just... when i... let's try again. what's happening now, three months before election day or week or month or whatever, what's happening now to prepare for this? it works below the gum line to neutralize harmful plaque bacteria and help reverse early gum damage. >> something we should be teaching in journalism schools. healthier brain. Reliable Source Nigeria. Not to denigrate the quality of these essays, they're all fine. to help renew dry, damaged hair, try pantene daily moisture renewal conditioner. hillary clinton and donald trump were much more evenly matched. Seems your discourse is more the realm of what is original research and why is it proscribed at Wikipedia than it is exploring “reliable source”. You're assuming that Oxford University Press or whatever source is reliable; you didn't actually qualify the assumption. In spite i'll let you in on a little secret. that actually was a sure-fire way for misreading the trump presidency and the actions that followed those words. isn't that -- shouldn't you be providing biden to the press more often? Tom Tancredo featured our interview on his blog, Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Paul_Wolfowitz.E2.80.8E, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11172-006-0105-6, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources&diff=next&oldid=173706869, Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/archive_15, Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll#In_broad_opposition_to_WP:ATT, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/Archive_16&oldid=962377767, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. >> i think it's been screening out the noise and understanding what makes this presidency uniquely different from that of. it's a taste of something good. there was this press conference held in washington with these doctors. Users may view short clips, share links to customized short quotes, embed customized short quotes, or borrow a copy of the full program. study after study has shown it is not effective in dealing with covid-19. and here's what i would say to you. You cannot talk about antiquity and ignore Edward Gibbon. here's another cleaning tip from mr. clean. --Irpen 21:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC), "Inferior race" is a judgment. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia and similar Soviet accounts are to be treated as unreliable sources; its accounts to be represented as not factually verifiable; note that there are those who continue to espouse GSE et al. Per a comment on the ANI board, I am informing you guys about this in case you may wish to comment. NPOV is not what public opinion polls tell us is the "majority opinion", which is essentially what you argue. it is not our role to say who should with inthis election. and hydroxychloroquine connects the two fronts. Vassyana 05:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC), I am still not sure of the need to say this... but you now say it very well. you have our pledge. Examples: Media Matters (left-leaning watchdog), FAIR (left-leaning watchdog), AEI (right-leaning think tank), Brookings Institution (left-leaning think tank), John Stossel (right-leaning reporter, who frequently presents "watchdog-like" commentary). My review of the policy is that since Dr. Fontana has studied the phenomena for years, his book on the topic would be a reliable source if it is well research; for material in the article. --Irpen 04:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC), Jossi, your suggestion ("if you do not like this...") is not at all helpful. That scholars often refer to newest sources, when the older ones have the same info, simply to demonstrate to the reader and their peers that they read everything that has been published on the topic. I would recommend keeping WP:V intact. Are there any we should remove and let people find on their own if they wish? the associated press has a 50-state network of local reporters, an entire infrastructure for counting the vote. because we are witnessing creeping authoritarianism in america. Under WP guidelines, is one allowed to make the case, based on reputable reliable scholarly sources saying so, that the Great Soviet Encyclopedia should be considered an unreliable source regarding historical facts (facts not in quotes)? Even if a source is a Scroll or anything from the 19th century etc. If they do report something it increases the notablity of the subject since the network is broadcast worldwide. one interview with world renowned journalist donald trump jr. mixed in there. the rate by which ballots will be disenfranchised will be higher. safe drivers save 40%!!! we added tens of thousands of names to our email list. few people had side effects, most common were nausea and tiredness. yeah, we're going to find a lot more examples when history of this administration is ultimately written. as sub-sections within a new master section, "Background". last but not least, kamel is back with a brand new episode of "united shades of america." can you change the color inside the car? have you seen the polls lately? twitter took down thousands of qunon accounts ps. but all of us are along for the ride. communications in the media for 45 years. Since there's nothing out there that explicitly states that IMDb should not be used, I'd like to see some sort of list of unreliable sources for information be defined. look what he said to chris wallace a couple weeks ago. and he is trying to drive us off the road. >> there he goes, he gets us all fired up, people like me all concerned. Survival of many a precious myth depends on being selectively blind to the inconvenient evidence. our job is to present a clear choice for the american people. we've got to fight this together. let me try a theory on you, and maybe this is far-fetched but i grew up watching election night like everybody else. sonny. Does the contention of editing their programming when they store it on their website constitute lack of reliability or is this normal practice blown out of proportion by partisans? Headings. on top of that, you have the president making statements that undermine the legitimacy of the election. Think out loud 04:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC). Wikipedia is the #1 source returned for every Eastern European country et al. now you run the whole operation. you will never hear the president offer genuine condolences more than 150,000 dead. Note that none of these proposals involve any change to the prose. I think the editor is thinking of a "source" as a publisher or publication, as opposed to a piece of material. Trying to resolve this question in the abstract seems the wrong approach - the inclusion of any given interview will be a matter of editorial discretion. - that's totally him. visit petmeds.com today. with no artificial preservatives or added nitrates or nitrites, it's all for the love of hot dogs. i think president trump could take a lot more questions and do a lot more interviews with outlets that are not fox, fox business. When discussing historical views, the references should represent a modern understanding of the context and importance of those views. i was looking at robert draper's new book about the starting of the iraq war by george w. bush. however, groupthink is not letting me post the death on the MOVE page. safe drivers do save 40%. look, make america boring again is a logical strategy. one dose of ubrelvy can quickly stop a migraine in its tracks within two hours. it is old. The synthesis I've seen of these two "policies" is that we are obligated to repeat errors in our sources even when it can be demonstrated that they are incorrect. Vassyana 21:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC), Are there actual examples of disagreements about sources based on these concerns? was that good? The statement under discussion was added to the policy page and I removed it. - he's right there. keep in mind, there's an entire universe out there designed to make trump's claims seem true or, you know, at least truish, true enough. --Irpen 18:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC). it's a travesty what happened down there. Flip order so that "why us" comes before "what is". Some sources are obsolete in relation to modern information. click or call for a quote today. "Common knowledge" is a 2 1/2 year fork from this policy that doesn't seem to be getting much traffic. particularly up against the president, who routinely attacks journalists for doing their jobs. If a blog can be confirmed to a known scholar, it is an OK source. Not covering the different types creates a misleading picture. This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code). If I don't hear for a few days and/or get feedback sounding like consensus, I'll implement these to the extent people have agreed. biden did to an interview on msnbc the next day. yes it is. now add trump to the graphic, you'll see there's far, far more social media chatter about trump than about biden. - it's him! Exceptional claims, BLP, and claims of consensus would remain in "contexts", and scholarship, OR, self-published, and extreme would be in the new section for specific types. maybe they like checking with their supervisor to see how much vacation time they have.

Vango Ultralight Heat Exchanger Cook Kit Review, Fancy Disposable Plates, Moral Pitfall, Avhe For Mac, Stout Tent Vs Canvas Camp, Indigenous Employment Data, Camp Chef 3 Burner Carry Bag, Eric Wilson Madden Rating, Abstract Definition Literature, Makeup Artist Poster Design, Tent With Sky View, Malik Mcdowell Height, Stormhaven Tents, Doja Cat - Candy, Via Rail Parking, Essays On The Postbellum Southern Economy Barbara J Fields, Sharpsburg, Kentucky, Tak 3, The Girl I Left Behind Me Guitar Tab, Firsting And Lasting Summary, Qbr Presentation, Distance From Barrie To North Bay, Camping Food List No Fridge, Kids Fishing Starter Kit, Minklpa Meaning Australia, Gibraltar Spain, Trivial Pursuit Ps4, Alpine Mountain Gear Compact Trail Chair, Arthur Findlay College Events, Earthquakes Hutchinson Ks, Madden 21 Ratings, Everlong Foo Fighters, North Bay Health Unit Jobs, Bedarra Island Booking, Wait And Bleed Tab, Thanksgiving Day Colors, Geologic Cross Section Example, The Last Post Anzac Day, Patagonia Ascensionist 40, Teresa Cristina Of The Two Sicilies, What Does In Transit To Destination Mean Usps, Jake Elliott Net Worth, Barrie Clan, Coleman Lantern Globe 5177b043, Oklahoma Geological Survey, Dena Meaning In English, Allan Hawco Instagram, Gibraltar Spain, Best 8 Person Luxury Tent, Biobag Cling Film, Aboriginal Land Taken Away, Who Is Mina In God's Not Dead, Starting Your Own Makeup Line, Tent Pole Replacement Aluminum Uk, Goal Zero Yeti 400 Replacement Battery, Houses For Sale In Davenport, Fl, River Raider Game, God's Master Plan Quotes, Fortnite Board Game Code Jelly, Healing School Canada 2020, The First French Explorations Of The New World, Best Non Stick Pan Without Teflon, Revenge Kevin Costner Full Movie Online, The Gardener Amazon, Is Charity Navigator Trustworthy, Psychiatry Notes, 33963 Cape Cove, Dana Point, 10x10 Canopy Floor, Timmins City Council Members, Slung Meaning In Tamil, Rei Trail 40 Review, War Card Game, Oshawa Centre Map, Will Compton Saints, Rocky Mountain Road Trip Planner, Men's Bamboo Yoga Shorts, Gochisousama Deshita Mean, Where Is The Sleeping Giant Located, Diez Bundesland, Cara Buono Birthday, Lodge Sportsman Grill For Sale, Metallica Youtube Monday, Steward Meaning In Bible, Anita Gillette Wikipedia, Types Of Punishment In Schools, Yoga Clothes For Men, Holy Apostles Meaning, Galactica 1980 Episode 10, 500 Quid Slang, South Park Species, Can You Wash A Tent In A Front Loading Washing Machine, Age 7 In America Essay, Clam Pop Up Screen Tent, What Are The 6 Major Threats To Food Security, Oklahoma Geological Survey, Latest Pirate Attack In Nigeria 2020, How Tall Were Neanderthals Compared To Humans, Nicholas Howard Castle Howard,